Connect with us

Gaming

‘Final Fantasy VII’ Remake Will Never Be The Same

And that’s a good thing.

Published

on

Several weeks ago, Square Enix dropped the latest updates to the long-awaited remake of Final Fantasy VII.

The breathtaking full trailer plus demo session erased the pessimists’ worst fears of its faithfulness to the original. At the same time, the reveal also worried the best hopefuls with the confirmed overhaul of the game’s pacing.

But no matter which side you are on with its development, the overall verdict was more or less, the same. It will never be the same experience as your childhood memories dearly wish it is.

Even as early as the very first confirmation in 2015 that the remake project is real and ongoing, the consensus was that, apart from noticeable graphical updates, it will be a significantly different game. That’s a no brainer. It is the only conclusion for anyone who is even aware of the current gaming landscape.

Thus, many of the core elements of the original game are set to be altered significantly or even removed altogether. Linear progression style equipment and items are all gone, the episodic — but a continuous story — were removed, the ever classic ATB system has been changed, and so on. Based on what we have seen from the trailer so far, all of these seem to check out.

Understandably, this isn’t merely about action games being more popular nowadays. Nor, just about polishing graphics to near realistic levels — its all about the targeted players. Gamers today who, contrary to what they might say about “classic gaming,” would most likely not appreciate a remake of an RPG that copied itself entirely onto a modern visual format.

True, there would always be a particular portion of its intended audience that would want a few graphical touches. But potential players of Final Fantasy VII Remake, upon its official release in 2020, would already have a different experience, especially knowing all the other game releases after.

Why? Our preferences in gaming have considerably changed after all these decades. At the very least, compared to what we used to expect in 1997 when Final Fantasy VII first altered the course of what was back then Squaresoft.

Take Resident Evil 2, for example. One of the most voiced opinions about the remake of the game was that classic tank controls should be implemented, and not the over-the-shoulder style that many games of the same genre do nowadays.

While that would satisfy a selected portion of its potential audience, there is absolutely no doubt that it would not provide the remake its needed current generation improvement. The introduction of modern third-person mechanics in Resident Evil 4 alone proved that such tank controls are, frankly speaking, already archaic. Apart from pure nostalgia, it does not enhance the enjoyment of the game.

As such, while the return of the exact ATB system we know would be appreciated as a way to keep the game intact as a classic, there is no improvement in its replay. Perhaps that is why Square Enix took the middle ground and combined action-style play with what was introduced as the “ATB gauge” for Final Fantasy VII Remake; no longer similar, but still familiar.

Another related dilemma comes in the confirmation of its episodic structure, with the detail that the first game will take place only in Midgar (which is only about the early 2-5 hours of the original game). This could be easily seen as a move by the company to milk the franchise as much as possible, while being able to slowly release updates for the same game, presumably within a stretch of several months to a couple of years.

The concern this time is comparatively justified. However, releasing the entire game on such an engine with untested balancing issues for later parts of the story, or additional content based on newer concepts, especially with the hype and expectation that players would want to play the game as soon as possible, is a difficult job nowadays.

As pointed out by YouTuber and developer Andrew Price, graphics alone eat up a significant portion of a game’s development schedule and funding. Even more so, to a highly anticipated game that practically and has absolutely no option to fail.

Remember how it took several years to get from the teaser announcement to the demo last month? Designing isn’t just building visual assets or crafting the game engine, or its combat system. Conceptualization also takes part. If there are no solid ideas, there will be no development. If the plan is not stable enough, then retracing the path to another idea may yet again take some time.

In conclusion, being pessimistic and no longer considering Final Fantasy VII Remake “the game it used to be” is not wrong. However, we need to understand that it needs to be different (precisely) since it needs improvements.

Because let’s face it, as much as we love the original — as much as it was one of the most essential elements of our childhood — Final Fantasy VII isn’t perfect. Remember when W-item duplication was a thing? How about one-shotting Emerald and Ruby weapons? Why did Shinra rebuild Nibelheim, even putting actors as villagers if barely anyone visits the place? And who is the mother of Red XIII’s kids at the end credits?

Besides, as we have seen and heard with the ATB gauge system and the kickass (semi-official) normal battle theme remix, all the necessary nostalgia bits seems to be very promising so far.

Christian is a passionate geek who loves to let everyone know the latest in science and technology. He is also a gamer at heart and is often looking for a balanced compromise that could allow him to present both sides of his interests appreciably.

1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. hayabusa82

    July 9, 2019 at 9:25 am

    I never wanted the exact same experience I had with the original. Thats impossible, times change tech changes. I just wanted to see a modern rendition of the classic game’s formula. That’s what we’re getting, the whole remake vs reimagined argument is stupid. The best remakes are not identical to the originals, they’re vastly different.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gaming

Resident Evil 5 And 6 Invades Nintendo Switch This Fall

A perfect release date for the classic survival horror high-octane action franchise.

Published

on

The official Twitter account for Resident Evil gave an update with a message that unveiled the official release date of the previously announced Resident Evil 5 and 6 for the Nintendo Switch.

That initial announcement was made during this year’s E3 when Capcom briefly presented a bunch of different updates concerning the franchise. The short 35-second trailer gave a montage on how the two games are to be visually rendered on the console, with tantalizing teasers on how the Nintendo Switch is set to optimize its co-op play modes.

Details on how exactly the two games would be ported on the Nintendo Switch was understandably quite scant. Even after a month later, there are still no specifics other than the short montage. How it will be released (either as download or as hardware) was not specified either, although it is very unlikely that it will have a ROM cartridge release, at least for North American players.

Perhaps the biggest, and probably obvious catch to this announcement is that unlike Resident Evil 4, Resident Evil 5 and 6 are fairly centered on co-op mechanics. Both single-player story modes of the two titles require the player to interact with a partner AI or be able to find another player to control either character.

Thus the Nintendo Switch could perhaps be the best game console for both titles, as evidently presented by its E3 2019 teaser trailer.

In Resident Evil 5, this started with Chris Redfield and Sheva Alomar. The implementation of the partner AI here was not as perfect. But as it was the first time for the game to implement such a feature, it was quite understandable. Even if getting Wesker to catch live rockets can get quite annoying.

This was vastly improved in Resident Evil 6 when the game not only introduces one pair of characters, but three whole pairs of different characters meant to survive and go through stages of the entire story. Several more commands became available, and its core co-op mechanics became much more integral to the story’s progression compared to Resident Evil 5.

In addition, the AI itself was so much more useful and “competent” in terms of regular combat compared to either Chris or Sheva.

The teaser trailer already showed a split-screen co-op mode, when the Switch is docked, and when it is on Portable Mode. While using Joy-Cons to control either character is already a given default. It is quite questionable how playable it could be when the console’s 6.2-inch screen is split further into two for each player.

Because unlike games such as Mario Kart 8 Deluxe, where screen estate is evenly split for a two-player mode, the trailer shows the traditional quarter-screen split for the two Resident Evil games. This already pushes it into 4-player Mario Kart territory, which, as we all frustratingly know, definitely needs a lot of squinting if you’re going to do it on Portable Mode.

Even worse if you plan to do it on Lite.

A dual-screen mode would have been perfect for such co-op play, if not for the current technical limitations of the Nintendo Switch. Perhaps sometime in the near future, if Nintendo finally relents and opens such Wii U-esque feature for its users.

Then again, you still have the option to go for classic two-player co-op mode on a bigger screen in Docked Mode.

Both Resident Evil 5 and 6 will be available at the Nintendo eShop with an online retail price tag of $30. In North America however, a more bundled version, featuring Resident Evil 4, 5 and 6 will instead be available as a single product for $60. The release date is officially set on October 29th as per yesterday’s announcement, which makes the purchase just in time for this year’s Halloween.

Continue Reading

Gaming

‘Detective Pikachu’ Now the Highest Grossing Video Game Movie Of All Time

On just its first few months at the box office.

Published

on

Latest numbers have indicated that the recently released movie Detective Pikachu has grossed almost $436 million since its grand worldwide premiere last May 10, 2019. This achievement makes the movie the current record holder for the highest-grossing video game movie of all time.

According to Box Office Mojo, the values were crunched from tallying both its domestic and foreign ticket sales over two months. In the United States alone, it already almost broke even with its $150 million budget by grossing $143 million. Overseas, it managed to add even more at around $286 million during the same time, bringing it around the current total mentioned earlier.

Apart from the United States, Japan, and China, Detective Pikachu also managed to achieve high ticket sales on relatively lesser populated countries such as Argentina ($1.6 million), New Zealand ($1.6 million), Norway ($1.9 million), and Vietnam ($1.5 million). During the opening weekend alone, most of these countries even grossed at almost half the amount of the currently tallied total each respective region.

In the United States, the movie premiered to $20.7 million earnings on the very first day, eventually grossing to $54 million during the next several days. This was just second to highly anticipated Avengers: Endgame, which premiered only a month prior.

The previous contender for the highest-grossing video game film of all time was Warcraft. Premiered in 2016, it earned a total of $47 million in the United States, and $386 million at the international box office, with a total of $433 million worldwide. This is despite having mixed to generally negative reviews from most of its critics.

It is also notable mention that the stated $433 million is the current total since it was premiered three years ago, whereas Detective Pikachu already surpassed it by around $3 million more on its second month.

Detective Pikachu tells the story of former Pokémon trainer Tim Goodman, played by Justice Smith, and the unusually gruff, but very chatty Detective Pikachu, voiced by Ryan Reynolds. Together, they attempt to complete the puzzle surrounding the mysterious circumstances of the apparent death of Tim’s father.

Even before the movie was released, Detective Pikachu has already received a lot of buzz from many different media outlets. The reception was generally positive from a wide variety of audiences, with similar positive reactions from the critics themselves. One of the most praised things about the film is how Pokémon, which are visually designed straight for 2D cartoon-like settings, were able to seamlessly integrate themselves into the real world with just minor tweaks in their overall design.

Ryan Reynold’s performance as the eponymous Detective Pikachu was also highly lauded, as it provided the necessary distinction to an otherwise already generic type of Pokémon within its lore and universe.

Lastly, the movie adaptation was also able to convey an interesting story that stays true to its own franchise. This is as opposed to many, many other failed video game movies that, instead of being treated as directly related titles, were presented with heavy priority on promotion or advertising.

Take note that the term “video game movie” typically refers to derivative, often live-action, adaptations of video game titles that are not meant to be directly canon to the original franchise. For example, the Assassin’s Creed (2016), or the all-time favorite classic Mortal Kombat (1995). This does NOT include extended titles that either developed or continued with the original game.

Final Fantasy VII: Advent Children, for example, is NOT what you typically refer to a “video game movie,” even though technically it is a film directly related to a video game.

So, what does the massive success of Detective Pikachu tells us about the future of video games in the film? As mentioned, movies adapted from game titles have traditionally been panned or reviewed negatively, due to either missing the important core elements of that franchise, or just plain ignoring what the original game really is.

It is hoped that this film should be taken as a good example. A specimen that future video game film executives and producers can look at, in order for them to finally prioritize what a franchise’s long-time dedicated fans would really appreciate.

Continue Reading

Gaming

Young Gamer Spends Almost $4,000 In ‘Hidden Artifacts’ Microtransaction

Apparently on just one single game.

Published

on

A BBC report that discussed recent occurrences of overspending in games detailed one particular incident of a mother’s son. This young gamer, as recounted, had spent more than £3,160 (about $4,000) in one game alone, far more than what is ordinarily conceivable for such an entertainment medium.

The game in question was the mobile game Hidden Artifacts. This title is a fairly popular game developed by Blastworks, that is built on the mechanics of tapping sections of an area shown on-screen for clues and information, that would lead you to the next objective.

Hidden Artifacts has a standard microtransaction system that is integrated directly on game (story) progress. This design may or may not ultimately be one of the factors, but the very existence of the system itself did affect the son of Susie Breare, who ended up spending the amount mentioned above, presumably trying to bypass the game’s restrictions, as he casually tried to progress continuously.

His son was reported to be a 22-year old young adult. However, Mrs. Breare explains that he has several different psychological and physiological issues. Among these were cerebral palsy, autism, and several learning disabilities. According to her, he had the cognitive capabilities of a seven-year-old.

She claimed that due to his inability to interact with people regularly, he is far more glued to his iPad and PlayStation for entertainment and education. Hence, his seemingly unnatural obsession for the mobile game app.

The reported amount was said to have been cumulatively spent starting February until March this year, in a span of about a month. The grand sum was claimed to have been equivalent to his son’s entire savings up to that point in his life.

While Apple’s iTunes was entirely receptive to her plight, she managed to “hit a brick wall” when the developer of the game itself is yet to give any form of response to her numerous calls and messages. It is unknown at the moment if the amount spent will ever be refunded.

The issue of microtransactions and questionable additional purchases in games has been one of the most contentious topics in gaming as of late. It spans many issues and problems from various situations, from unsupervised obsessive game spending by children, to whether loot boxes can be considered as a form of gambling.

The problem of compulsive game spending has now escalated to significant heights, that authorities are now trying to crack the case. Many companies such as EA, are currently under fire from legal accusations related to these issues, with their current business practices now generally viewed as unfavorable, even ridiculed to a significant degree by the internet community.

The BBC report itself cited many more cases of people spending too much on certain games. The central themes of these incidences being that gamers with little to no authority (children, people with mental disabilities, etc.) having direct access to financial sources, game transaction systems being too deceptive to let users know how much they are actually spending, or exploiting the very compulsive nature of some people to continue gambling on loot box-type in-game purchases.

As of now, regulations on such practices are currently being considered. However, there is still no definitive action done to mitigate the adverse effects that are happening right now. Even more egregious, is that the very same overspending issues commonly seen in continuous game purchases today are summarily prevented in actual gambling by specific laws.

For the moment, the general hope is to get at least more people to be acutely aware of the issue. In the current absence of regulations for these business practices, being vigilant about how you spend in-game, or how you provide access to pay, will be essential to prevent being the next game overspending victim.

Continue Reading

Trending