Tech companies are today’s driving forces in the economic world, mostly because of the introduction of the Internet. It allows a plethora of companies to create products and services, which they can communicate to, interact with, and ultimately, make sales across a very far-reaching and diverse audience.
Give or take, tech companies can easily crash and burn, but they can also quickly soar like rockets blasting off to space, and when they do, it happens so fast that the community around them would hardly even notice.
The general idea about tech companies revolves around the notion of success and the opportunities that come along with it. When a particular product or service is excellent, everybody knows it’s going to grow big, and it’s going to grow fast. Furthermore, successful tech companies bring in more jobs, and overall, strengthens the community it calls home.
However, there is a general misconception with tech companies; where all they bring are good tiding for the community around them. People or even the media hardly talk about the adverse effects these companies bring into the lives of the communities in which they decide to reside. That is, of course, until it’s too blatant to neglect.
In a very public demonstration, we have seen Amazon pull up a beauty pageant of sorts across all the cities in North America. They called it a search for the location of their second headquarters; we call it blatant capitalistic greed that aims to take advantage of the government’s resources and bend political will into their favor.
During the fiasco that was New York’s Long Island City, government officials were torn between giving Amazon the $3 billion project that it was asking, including a helipad, or refuse because of the tech giant’s reputation for going against worker’s unionization and other workplace misconducts.
Nonetheless, most New Yorkers were like horses to a carrot with Amazon’s bait of an additional 25,000 jobs and billions of dollars in taxes for the government. If you think about it, $3 billion was a dollar compared to what they would have gotten in return. However, the way Jeff Bezos’, the richest man in the world with over a hundred billion dollars in his name, wanted to offer the deal was outright out of blind greed as he could have easily afforded to build their HQ2.
On other news, Seattle is rivaling for the crown of America’s next Silicone Valley with the big tech having its headquarters in the city. Seattle’s also becoming a hub for tech startups.
According to a GeekWire report, Seattle supports 165,264 high tech software and services jobs, representing 42% of all office jobs in the city. Some of the United States’ most significant and most influential tech firms call Seattle home or are significant employers in the area, including Amazon (approximately 40,000 people), Microsoft (around 45,000), Accenture (over 1,200) and Google (over 2,000).
Due to the success of tech giants, the city has attracted more than 105,000 new residents since 2010, a population increase of 16 percent.
From the point of view, a very far end, you could see that people who work for tech companies have amazing job locations with beautifully laden landscaping, gleaming buildings, and an excellent payroll. But, you won’t get to see the average person who hardly works for tech such as a cleaner or entirely doesn’t work or tech at all.
In a report by the NBC, they stated that Seattle’s having a significant problem with housing. Specifically for people who don’t make enough money to afford them, at least in their city.
Quick-to-grow tech companies have given the residents a whiplash and could hardly adjust to how much the city is changing as more and more people flock the state for job opportunities, specifically, how real estate has drastically increased over the years.
As a summary, real estate functions mainly out of demand. So, when more and more people want a piece of land, the price for the chunk goes higher and higher. With fast-growing cities like Seattle, this could easily pose as a problem for people who still work with low to medium-income salaries.
Tech companies aren’t the ones mainly at fault, but it cannot be denied that this is simply an unavoidable circumstance from the situation. They may have helped 42% of the workforce, but let’s not forget about the rest of the 58%.
In conclusion, tech companies are not the spawn of evil, but nor they are the best thing that could ever happen to a community. There are pros and cons to every situation; it’s just worthy to note that people shouldn’t be blinded by big promises so quickly.
With Android Out, There Are Still Other Alternatives For Huawei
When Huawei was subjected to a witch hunt by the US government for allegedly aiding the Chinese government in its efforts to spy on the country, and as a pivotal player to potentially economically sabotage the country, an executive order was launched against the China-based tech giant that effectively forced U.S. tech companies to sever ties with Huawei.
And to comply with this, Google revoked Huawei’s license to use its open-source operating system, Android.
The ban from Google has brought Huawei’s future into limbo; making it uncertain for users, especially concerning security updates for their Huawei and Honor phones —or the general idea whether their devices will still be able to run altogether. Following the announcement, Huawei assured its users that all phones that were sold ahead of the banning and those that are already in stock will continue receiving updates from Android.
But now that more and more companies and U.S. tech giants are starting to enforce the ban against Huawei, what is left for Huawei to do to continue competing in the competitive global market of smartphones? What alternatives does it have in place of Android?
Does it still stand a chance?
Hongmeng, Huawei’s own operating system is on the move
One of the most obvious choice for Huawei to continue their business in the smartphone arena is to develop its operating system. And reports revealed that it has been doing so — as the Beijing company has already foreseen circumstances like a Google/Android ban.
Following the announcement of Google that it will be revoking Huawei’s Android license, rumors about a Huawei-exclusive operating system has been developed by the company since 2012. They called it Hongmeng.
The company has been testing the new OS on selected devices under closer door and closed environment. The source also said that the testing was accelerated for the new operating system to be ready for situations just like this.
One massive problem with this option, however, is that since it is a new operating system, it may be a challenge for Huawei to create an applications environment as robust as that of Android. But Huawei also has a solution to this problem: to release its own App Gallery.
A report from Bloomberg has said that the Chinese phone maker has been sweet-talking developers and networks to get on board. The story says that Huawei is offering considerable amounts to developers and systems to install their app store in new phones. While it is still unclear if the new app marketplace will be for all new phones or if it will be exclusive to its models only, this seems like a sound solution for Huawei’s predicament.
Even if Huawei can convince developers to develop apps for its OS and app gallery, another challenge is to make sure that porting apps on its OS becomes sustainable for developers to update. To survive this, Huawei should be able to sell enough phones and create enough demands for the developers to earn from it and prevent them from abandoning the platform altogether.
Or they can use Sailfish OS Fork
Another viable OS alternative for Huawei instead of the Android operating system fiasco is tapping into the Linux-based open-source operating system Sailfish OS Fork. Some reliable reports suggest that Huawei might use an existing smartphone OS named as Sailfish OS on its smartphones and tablets. Sailfish OS can be used as a base to develop the new Aurora OS for international Huawei smartphones.
And Huawei is seriously considering this OS as an Android alternative. Huawei CEO Guo Ping discussed the possibility of using Sailfish OS on Huawei devices with Konstantin Noskov, the minister of digital development, communications, and mass media of Russia.
One primary advantage of using Sailfish OS Fork over Huawei developing its OS is that this Linux-based operating system is also compatible with most Android apps. This means that Huawei does not need to create an entirely new app ecosystem for users to use their apps. At present, Sailfish OS is installed on only four devices, namely Sony Xperia X, XA2, XA2 Plus, and XA2 Ultra.
And since privacy is one of the most talked about issue in the tech world today, another advantage of the Sailfish OS Fork is precisely that. The OS does not store nor use user data against their consent and also, Sailfish OS only stores data to run its services and not sold to third-party services.
Android can find a way to work with Huawei again
The thing about Android OS that makes it a complicated venture when it comes to Huawei is that, although the operating system is open-source — meaning anyone can use it freely for their project — the source code is still licensed by Google, an American company that is required to comply with the Huawei ban EO. But reports suggest that Google is against this decision and is working on finding ways to continue working with Huawei amidst the controversial legislation. For one, Google has urged the US government to lift the ban against the Chinese smartphone manufacturer — citing security threats can be more viable with the policy.
In the short term, the company has secured a temporary license to continue to supply software updates to existing phones. The permit allows Huawei to take action “necessary to provide service and support, including software updates or patches, to existing Huawei handsets that were available to the public on or before May 16, 2019.” The license will also allow Huawei to maintain its existing network equipment, and to receive security vulnerability disclosures. Reports suggest that Android is working to extend this license.
With these moves from Google and Android, it is possible that companies can find a workaround that would allow them to work with Huawei in the future indefinitely; but this remains uncertain.
The ‘Flying-V’ Could Be The Game-Changer In The Airline Industry
The future of aircraft lies in the development of V-shaped and fuel-efficient airplane known as the “Flying-V” created by Justus Benad — in an attempt to improve the sustainability of air travel.
Airlines are creating ways to lessen environmental hazard. Recently, the Virgin Atlantic used to recycle waste to power a commercial flight — an innovative approach to combat excessive use of fuel. Boeing and JetBlue resorted to creating hybrid electric planes with a hybrid propulsion system built in one of the genset and multiple electric motors and system architecture with distributed drives.
And today, the Netherland’s KLM Royal Dutch Airlines is taking another approach for commercial flights.
The development of a V-shaped or “Flying V” is getting a lift from the Dutch National Carrier who pledged to fund the project. The idea to modernize aircraft comes from the creative mind of Justus Benad, who was then a student at the Technical University of Berlin. Researchers from the Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands, or also called as TU Delft, later on, developed the idea.
What does the new aircraft offer?
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines is the flag carrier for the Netherlands. Its headquarter’s located in Amstelveen, and a part of the Air France-KLM group, as well as, a member of the SkyTeam airline alliance. It was founded in 1919, which makes it the oldest airline in the world operating under its original name. Up until now, it utilized several major commercial flights. True to its word “Bridging the World,” KLM wants to connect the world with its innovative approach in aircraft services.
Flying-V gives a radical new approach to an airplane’s overall design. It targets to put passenger seats inside the plane’s wings, and it could mainly decrease the amount of fuel needed for flights by a substantial 20 percent. It will use less fuel than the Airbus350-900 while carrying a similar number of passengers. The Flying-V will seat 314 while the Airbus A350 seats between 300 and 350.
TU Delft expressed that the institution has been flying these tube and wing airplanes for decades, but it looks like the configuration is reaching a plateau in terms of energy efficiency, Project Leader Roelof Vos told CNN.
The design is going to imitate the A350’s 65-meter (213 feet) wingspan — enabling it to use the existing airport infrastructure.
Fuel for life
On Monday, KLM announced that aside from putting passengers in the plane’s wings, the fuel tanks and cargo hold will be placed there as well. The new configuration that TU Delft proposes has seen some synergy between the fuselage and the wing. The fuselage activity adds to the lift of the airplane and creates less aerodynamic drag.
Such innovation was needed as a stepping stone to greater efficiency, while technology was still being developed to create large-scale electric airplanes without compromising the environment. Aviation is contributing about 2.5 percent of global CO2 emissions, and the industry is still growing, so the company needs to provide more sustainable airplanes, added Vos.
Electrified airplanes, on the other hand, can be too heavy and it can’t fly people across the Atlantic on electric planes. The world needs new technologies that reduce fuel burn differently, and Flying-V is the answer. Its increased fuel efficiency is mostly the result of its aerodynamic design.
Researchers plan to fly a scale model this September, Vos said — while a mock-up of the newest cabin design will be available for the public to view at Amsterdam’s Schiphol airport in October. The viewing activity is also a part of KLM’s 100th-anniversary celebration.
For the meantime, the design is set for arduous testing. The said University had numerical testing and preliminary wind tunnel tests. The latter needs to be done several times with high-speed and low-speed wind tunnels to establish the airplane’s efficiency.
The finished product is expected to enter the service between 2040 and 2050.
Can Huawei Compete With Google? Only Time Can Tell.
When Google revoked Huawei’s Android license practically banning it from receiving future software updates and support from Android and Play Store, the China-based company’s future was placed in limbo as the company struggles to stay afloat following the controversial Google decision. But it seems that Huawei is up for a vengeance: if they can no longer use Android’s platform and could integrate with Google Play Store, they will make their own, practically competing against Google.
The revocation of Huawei’s license follows after the heightened crackdown by the U.S. government on Chinese companies. Previously, the Trump administration has been lobbying to its allies to ban Huawei’s 5G technology citing that the Chinese government can use the company for espionage and economic sabotage.
Competing against Android is not a first for other tech giants. Apple has been successful in running its OS and app store, but Microsoft was not as lucky. But the future is bright for Huawei to succeed in this feat, considering that it is now the biggest phone manufacturing and distribution company in the world. Huawei accounted for 19% of the worldwide smartphone market and became the second largest smartphone manufacturer, overtaking Apple, in Q1 2019.
In order for this to work, Huawei should work fast…very fast.
Huawei’s hope is to launch its own operating system. Some reports have mentioned that Huawei is already working with its own operating system as they have already forecasted that such thing as a Google ban will happen in the near future. The tech giant has developed Hongmeng, Huawei’s own operating system, since 2012 and they are said to be poised to release it anytime soon, reports say. The company has been testing the new OS on selected devices under closer door and closed environment.
Nonetheless, it is still unclear whether Hongmeng will be the official name of the OS from Huawei. Experts note that even if Huawei can successfully launch its operating system, the company will still be faced with the challenge of establishing an app ecosystem. It would take Huawei a lot of time to build apps that are compatible with the new operating system.
But Huawei also has a solution to this problem: to release its own App Gallery. A report from Bloomberg has said that the Chinese phone maker has been sweet-talking developers and networks to get on board. The story says that Huawei is offering considerable amounts to developers and networks to install their app store in new phones. While it is still unclear if the new app marketplace will be for all new phones or if it will be exclusive to its models only, this seems like a sound solution for Huawei’s predicament.
China is a lucrative market and exposure to the difficult app market has provided the Chinese company much leverage on developers and networks to encourage them to support its venture; an advantage that Google, Apple, and Microsoft cannot exploit. Whether this incentive is enough for Huawei to pull this goal off or not is something only time can tell.
It is also said that to make things easier during this transition, Huawei is offering developers new tools to tweak their apps to run on its phones, meaning they can be ported over with minimal effort. It can be remembered that this is a similar strategy employed by Microsoft when it released the Windows OS, but it turned out to be ineffective in the long run as Lumia sales stalled over time.
Even if Huawei can convince developers to develop apps for its own OS and app gallery, another challenge is to make sure that porting apps on its own OS becomes sustainable for developers to update. To survive this, Huawei should be able to sell enough phones and create enough demands for the developers to earn from it and prevent them from abandoning the platform altogether.
With all that it’s work, Huawei’s plans are doable and could work, but it needs effort, much of it, and financial incentives to encourage key stakeholders to get on board.
Will this turn out in favour of Huawei? If Huawei works hard and works fast, it’s possible. But then again, only time can tell.
Science2 weeks ago
Norway’s Celebrity Beluga Whale ‘Hvaldimir’; A Russian Spy Or Child Therapist?
Automotive3 weeks ago
Ferrari’s Fastest Car: SF90 Stradale
Health2 weeks ago
‘Pokémon Sleep’ and ‘Pokémon Go Plus Plus’: From Walking More To Sleeping More
Offbeat3 weeks ago
Send A Baby To Mars, And Other Funny AI Generated Petitions
Advertising1 month ago
MailChimp Updates Pricing Policy, Now Charging Unsubscribed Emails In The Mailing List
Arts & Entertainment1 month ago
The CW And Netflix Break Up Means No More Riverdale?
Arts & Entertainment4 weeks ago
‘Young Sheldon’ Season 2 Finale: What’s Meant To Be Will Always Find Its Way To You
Technology1 month ago
Apple, Google, And Microsoft Started Protecting You From ZombieLoad Threat