There has been a disturbing character going around the internet challenging viewers to do a ‘MOMO Challenge’which is allegedly a suicide game. The video contains a character that looks very disturbing threatening players to do dangerous orders from it. The challenge goes from easy to difficult until it builds fear that causes players to kill themselves at the end of the game.
The video had already been reported by users to the authorities last year, but it seems like YouTube and Instagram has failed to take it down. There are reports that the video still appears on YouTube videos like Peppa Pig and Fortnite pooping midway through the videos.
Apparently, most victims of the MOMO Challenge are children since it pops on children’s videos. It has been terrifying how this has been circulating on the internet and seemingly going undetected for a time now.
Parents have turned in their reports about how the video had appeared on their child’s YouTube videos warning them that it’s going to kill them. It also made weird and disturbing noises while saying the words “I’m going to kill you,” according to a mother from Swindon. She confirmed how it appeared while the video her child was watching got interrupted by the Momo face.
A Japanese artist created the creepy-looking character, however, did not have any links to the suicide challenge. The artist’s character is now being used for the said MOMO Challenge probably because of its appearance.
The MOMO Challenge threatens its players that it (the Japanese character) will hurt them and their families if they do not obey or go through the self-harming game. After appearing in videos, it directs them to WhatsApp where it can communicate through voice and video messaging to its players.
Last year in Colombia, two children have already committed suicide after being challenged by the game.
Despite multiple reports on this game, YouTube and Instagram still have it even with enough pieces of evidence from people posting photos about the game on social media.
People on the internet have been warning other parents who allow their children to go on screen-time without proper supervision and have also been sharing their experiences with it.
Meanwhile, YouTube and Instagram stated that such contents are not allowed to be on their sites and are doing their best to take down these accounts that contain dangerous activities. They also encouraged their users to report if they come across such videos immediately.
Twitter Is Fighting Anti-Vaxx Misinformation With This New Tool
As the public pressure for tech companies and open platforms to do a better job in fighting fake news and misinformation, Twitter seems to be the newest tech company to set up mechanisms to curb anti-vaxx in the social media stratosphere.
Starting Friday, Twitter will be directing users who actively searched for tweets related to vaccination to a post from the United States Department of Health and Human Services linking them to several reliable sources of health information instead of anti-vaccination propaganda.
“Know the facts,” the post reads. “To make sure you get the best information on vaccinations, resources are available from the US Department of Health & Human Services.”
This follows the announcement made by the social media giant that it will be launching a new tool to help fight the rampant misinformation by prompting users to head to vaccines.org, a website ran by the Department of Health and Human Services.
“We’re committed to protecting the health of the public conversation on Twitter,” the blog post read. “Ensuring individuals can find information from authoritative sources is a key part of that mission.”
The intense pressure against social media platforms and other tech companies by lawmakers and the public to remove anti-vaxx propaganda from their platforms have yielded significant response. It all started when House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, wrote an open letter to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Google CEO Sundar Pichai regarding his concern with the technology giants which are authorizing the escalation of anti-vaccine misinformation.
His letters indicated that Facebook and Instagram are allowing, as well as, recommending messages that discourage parents from vaccinating their children. According to Schiff, this is a direct threat to public health and degraded progress in battling vaccine-preventable diseases. He also asked Zuckerberg whether distributing medically inaccurate and false information about vaccines violated the platform’s terms of service and if Facebook accepts paid advertisement from anti-vaccine activities, among others.
Facebook responded through a representative who said that the group has already taken steps to reduce the distribution of health-related misinformation and are currently working with outside experts on additional changes that will take place sooner.
Google, which also owns Youtube, has not directly responded to the letters but affirmed that it has worked to improve recommendations regarding misinformation. Schiff’s after seeing Youtube’s announcement last January which no longer recommends videos that violate its community guidelines including “content that could misinform users in harmful ways” was very pleased.
Heeding the same call, Youtube has launched several new mechanisms to discourage anti-vaccination content in their video sharing platform. The famous video-based social media network has started removing ads from anti-vaxx videos to demonetized them and discourage those who plan to leverage on the popularity of the anti-vaccine sentiment and produce contents which sell on Youtube.
Similarly, a letter has also been sent to Amazon to respond in the same manner as that of Youtube as several netizens have raised concerns that anti-vaxx publication was being advertised in the popular e-commerce site’s sponsored ads.
This time, as Twitter has its own contribution in resisting the growth of misinformation, have also taken a stand. The new tool shows up on Android, iOS, Twitter’s mobile site, and on the newly designed desktop site in the US, Canada, the United Kingdom, Brazil, and Korea as of right now.
In the past, a similar tool was launched by Twitter to direct users actively searching for terms relating to suicide to the contact number of a hotline for help. In the blog post released by Twitter to announce the new tool, the company is planning to extend this tool to other health-related search terms soon.
“This new investment builds on our existing work to guard against the artificial amplification of non-credible content about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines,” the blog said.
The intensifying social pressure was triggered by the influx of measles outbreak and the popularity of anti-vaxx sentiments in social media that lead to the declining number of children getting vaccinated. A few months ago, a state of emergency had been officially declared in Washington due to a measles outbreak which affected 58 people, same with other Asian countries like the Philippines. Experts believe that aside from the lack of vaccination, which caused the spread of the disease, anti-vaccine movements also are to blame on the said outpour.
Facebook Live One-Strike Approach Would Ban Offending Streamers On First Offense
Two months following the devastating shooting in Christchurch, Facebook remains in hot water for allegedly failing to take down the shooter’s live video streaming as the shooting happens, but Facebook is doing something about it by introducing a new set of rules that would govern their services.
Starting today, the San Francisco-based tech company will implement the “one-strike” policy for Facebook Live and its other live video streaming platforms. According to Facebook, a user can immediately get banned from using their live video streaming services for one offense for a certain period, such as 30 days. They clarified that this is specifically targeted to those people who violated their “most serious policies.” Facebook did not specify all the rules that would govern the new regulation, but their announcement pointed out to their updated community standards, especially the clause that prohibits spreading terrorist propaganda on the social media platform.
Furthermore, while the focus right now is for terrorism-related violations, the tech giant said that the new policy would soon expand to other topics and issues in the coming weeks. Aside from banning violators from using their live streaming services, Facebook also said that the same offenders would be barred from purchasing ads on the platform.
Facebook’s spokesperson said that under the new policy, the Christchurch shooter wouldn’t have been able to live stream the unfortunate event in the first. However, it is still unclear what the violation of the shooter was within the last 30 days before the shooting occurred.
Two months ago, during the Christchurch shooting, a live video of the incident had been broadcasted on the social media site, and Facebook did not take it down until more than 15 minutes through the video. In their defense, Facebook said that their late response was because no one has reported its existence.
However, Jared Holt, a reporter for Right Wing Watch, said he was alerted to the live stream and reported it immediately during the attack. “I was sent a link to the 8chan post by someone who was scared shortly after it was posted. I followed the Facebook link shared in the post. It was mid-attack, and it was horrifying. I reported it,” Holt tweeted. “Either Facebook is lying, or their system wasn’t functioning properly.”
“I definitely remember reporting this, but there’s no record of it on Facebook. It’s very frustrating,” Holt said. “I don’t know that I believe Facebook would lie about this, especially given the fact law enforcement is likely asking them for the info, but I’m so confused as to why the system appears not to have processed my flag.”
With the new policy, a single report will have had stopped the shooter from live streaming.
FACEBOOK FACES LAWSUIT
The slow response of Facebook on the Christchurch live stream incident, the company has faced public scrutiny and law suits. Facebook may be facing court soon for their failure to control the spread of the violent live broadcast of New Zealand’s Christchurch mosque shooting as a French Muslim group announced their plans to take the two social media platforms to court.
According to Abdallah Zekri, president of the CFCM’s Islamophobia monitoring unit, the organization had launched a formal legal complaint against Facebook and Youtube in France in March.
The council said it was suing the French branches of the two companies for “broadcasting a message with violent content abetting terrorism, or of a nature likely to seriously violate human dignity and liable to be seen by a minor,” according to the complaint. In France, such acts can be punished by three years’ imprisonment and €75,000 (£64,000) fine.
The announcement of the new policies being implemented by Facebook comes ahead of a move by New Zealand and France to urge tech companies and nations to work together to mitigate the growing popularity of extremist contents online. The non-binding agreement, called the Christchurch Call, is expected to be made known this week at a meeting of digital stakeholders for the Group of Seven Nations.
“I’ve spoken to Mark Zuckerberg directly twice now, and actually we’ve had good ongoing communication with Facebook,” New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour Monday. “The last time I spoke to him a matter of days ago, he did give Facebook’s support to this call to action.”
Matthew Herrick Speaks Up On The Dismissal Of Harassment Case Against Grindr: “I Am Heartbroken”
When a non-user is suing Grindr for harassment, it’s going to be interesting. Matthew Herrick, an up and coming actor, living in New York City, had had his life ruined when a salty ex-boyfriend used the popular dating site to send people to his apartment and his place of work telling him that he agreed to have sex with them.
Of course, Herrick sued. He did not only sue his ex-boyfriend, but he also sued Grindr for being a vehicle that allows the abuse and harassment to happen. Matthew’s high-profile legal case against the popular hookup platform highlights the ability of people to affect other people’s lives even if they work virtually. However, Herrick’s case has received a cold shoulder from the courts and outrightly dismissed the lawsuit opening the debate to whether these kinds of apps are protected by certain legal stature.
Initially, Herrick filed negligence and emotional distress claims from Grindr’s failure to remove his former boyfriend’s harassing and offensive postings but was turned down by a local court forcing the victim to take his case to an appellate court. The appeals court judges eventually rejected the motion two months ago.
“I am heartbroken,” laments Matthew Herrick upon hearing that his appeal was also denied.
“I find it reprehensible that a company that knew the horror I experienced from their platform for an entire year has no responsibility to step in or take any accountability,” Herrick wrote. “This wasn’t simply harassment. This was a full-fledged attack on my life.”
The basis of Herrick’s suit is that his then-boyfriend who he broke up with decided to use Grindr to torment him between October 2016 and March 2017. His ex set up fake profiles bearing his name and photos, essentially impersonating him, and allegedly directing interested men to go to his address for a hook-up. To make matters worse, the fake profile is meant to attract men who are into deviant sexual preferences like BDSM and hard-core sex. Furthermore, the profile description of the account appears to be incriminating to the innocent Matthew Herrick as it includes code words for drugs, unprotected sex, and bondage. The fake profile also falsely claimed that Herrick was HIV-positive.
According to the official court documents filed by Herrick, what happened to him was a “nightmare.” He characterized the event with strangers randomly appearing at his doorstep. While Herrick did his best to explain the circumstances to the men fooled into barging his home, there were those who thought that he is only role-playing and refused to leave, “aggressively demanding sex, sometimes violently.”
During the decision of the appellate court, the judge said that Grindr was protected from liability for exercising “a publisher’s traditional editorial functions,” or providing “‘neutral assistance’ in the form of tools and functionality available equally to bad actors and the app’s intended users.”
The first lawsuit was filed in January 2017 and was dismissed one year after filing. Herrick’s lawyer Tor Ekeland said in an interview he was “disappointed but not surprised” by Wednesday’s decision because courts are “extremely deferential to big tech” when interpreting the CDA.
As a response to Herrick’s accusations, the lawyers representing Grindr said that it rigorously worked to try to stop the alleged impersonation […] and identified and deleted numerous accounts.” Nonetheless, Grindr stood by its central defense that the app cannot be liable for content posted by a third party.
The app was invoking a specific stature that has also previously protected content-based applications from being sued — Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. Grindr – like Facebook, Reddit, Yelp or other online platforms that do not produce their own content – are generally immunized from lawsuits such as Herrick’s. Section 230 was intended to encourage freedom of expression online, but it leaves victims like Herrick without much legal recourse against powerful Internet companies. The decision made by the appeals court on the case of Herrick against Grindr further confirms the limitations of CDA and the extent of its protection to apps like Grindr.
“The weaponization of products has become a major issue with no legal recourse to the ones it harms,” Herrick wrote in his reply.
In a statement to Yahoo by Carrie Goldberg, she swore that she would spend her career in lobbying for the abolishment of the said stature. “I’m on a f***ing crusade against Section 230.”
- ‘Young Sheldon’ Season 2 Finale: What’s Meant To Be Will Always Find Its Way To You
- How Tech Companies Affect Communities In Places They Call ‘Home’
- Groundbreaking Discovery Paves Way To A New Understanding Of Lupus
- Cancer Research Infra Built To End Cancer Evolution
- Nissan-Renault’s Ghosn: From Hero To Zero
- Spotify Goes Big On Podcasts
- ‘John Wick 3’: Parabellum Has The Best Fight Scenes
How Tech Companies Affect Communities In Places They Call ‘Home’
Tech companies are today’s driving forces in the economic world, mostly because of the introduction of the Internet. It allows...
RingCentral VoIP Review
VoIP has had a significant shift from a technology exclusively used by the early adopters or hobbyist to a widely...
April Fools Jokes Aren’t Just “Jokes”
April Fools is undoubtedly a fun day, exceptionally if you have crafted the most elaborate prank on your friends and...
Facebook Should Do Better At Processing Community Standard Violations, And They Should Do It Fast
A few months ago, I saw a photo of myself used by another Facebook account with a “R.I.P. (Rest in...
Supporting Problematic Artists And Their Arts, An Opinion
As the world becomes swarmed by reports of famous artists – musicians, comedians, actors, painters – being alleged or in...
Ethical Regulation Of ‘Facial Recognition’ Is A Shared Responsibility
There is an ongoing discussion both in online and offline spaces regarding the growth of facial recognition technology and its...
Data Breach Epidemic: Solving The Problem In SMBs Will Solve The Problem For All
In the last two weeks, we’ve witnessed a vast amount of data breaches and information leaks, and the issue has...
We Agree To PM Ardern Of Keeping Christchurch Murderer Nameless, And The Media Should Listen
In the wake of Christchurch mosques shooting in New Zealand that killed 50 people at two mosques, the shooter is...
Apple vs. Police Authorities; A Cold War Against iPhone’s Anti-Snooping Patent
To protect its customers from hackers and illegal surveillance, Apple is developing an anti-snooping technology that would impede police and...
An Epidemic: Measles Or Misinformation?
2018 was the year when people started asking the question: ‘should I get my child vaccinated?’ Most people answered yes,...
Take A Look At The Predicted Future Of The VoIP Industry
For the past 20 years, VoIP has become an integral part of the lives of millions of people around the...
Choose The Right Call Center And The Best Contact Center Solutions of 2019
The Ins And Outs Of Business Communication Management For your business to exist in today’s world, you must know how...
How Instagram Corrupts Famous Locations In The World
Is Instagram corrupting the beauty of breathtakingly beautiful locations and sucking all the joy out of traveling? With the era...
Ways To Earn Cryptocurrency
Cryptocurrency is one of the growing medium for exchange in most countries as it offers a more convenient and safer...
Can We End Payday Loans?
We can’t neglect the fact that debt is one of the pressing problems in the country, especially in today’s economy....
Jumping From 4G To 5G: Here’s What 5G Can Do For You
One of the most awaited advancements in technology is the cellular industry. With its monthly updates on software, model and...
What are the cost factors of VoIP?
In the next few years, we might be saying goodbye to traditional telephone systems in exchange for Voice over Internet...
Manufacturing Firms are Investing More on Technology
Based on the recent research on how manufacturing companies are coming up in the market industry, they have been increasing...
Technology innovation in companies—for the better or the worse?
Technology has significantly impacted both homes and workplaces in the last years. As much as we want to keep our...
Arts & Entertainment2 days ago
The CW And Netflix Break Up Means No More Riverdale?
Google2 weeks ago
Pixel 3A And 3A XL Is Coming And Its Better Than We Thought
Cybersecurity4 days ago
Apple, Google, And Microsoft Started Protecting You From ZombieLoad Threat
Facebook2 weeks ago
New Feature Updates That Are Coming To Facebook Messenger And Instagram In The Near Future
Politics2 weeks ago
Michael Cohen: President Trump’s Loyal Lawyer and ‘Fixer’ to Serve a Three-year Sentence at the Federal Correctional Institution in Otisville, New York.
Google2 weeks ago
Smarter And More Practical ‘Google AI’ Techs?
Cybersecurity3 days ago
Ransomware Are Plaguing American Cities And Experts Warn That It Will Get Worse
Cryptocurreny3 days ago
Hacked Crypto Exchange ‘Cryptopia’ Is Selling Their Assets