Connect with us


Monsanto Protection Act, Put Into Law, Lets GMO Crops Have Free Reign



Monsanto Protection Act Signed By Obama


The actual bill signed into law is H.R. 933 which has been referred to as a “Farmer Assurance Provision.” You see, inside of the bill are great things for farmers that are “farmer friendly.” The problem is that hiding deep in the FY2013 Agriculture Appropriations bills is (Section 733 / Section 735) which is around 78 pages into the bill. The hidden bomb in this bill is being nicknamed the, “Monsanto Protection Act” because it gives GMOs (genetically modified organisms) and GE seeds (Genetically Engineered Seeds) a free pass to be produced, planted and put on your dinner plate.

One thing we should get straight however, is that Monsanto is not the only beneficiary to this bill opening up the floodgates to genetically modified crops and seeds being used in the US food system. Other companies that will benefit from the “Monsanto Protection Act” are companies like DuPont, Dow Chemical and other chemical and biotech food research corporations. The better way to look at it is another nickname for this hidden part of the Farmers Bill that was passed, “biotech rider.” The biotech rider name is given because inside of all these great things for farmers, was very powerful language that some are saying is destroying the U.S. Constitution.

It was on March 26th, 2013 that President Obama officially signed into law the H.R. 933 “Monsanto Protection Act” Bill. There were a few news organizations that stood up for the people to bring attention to the 250,000 people that signed a petition to get President Obama to veto the bill. It was Food Democracy Now that lead the charge to get people to “Stop the Monsanto Protection Act.” The main charge by the website says:

“In the past, legal advocates have successfully won in court the right to halt the sale and planting of unapproved GMO crops while the approval of those crops is under review by a federal judge. This dangerous new House provision, which we’re calling the Monsanto Protection Act, would strip judges of their constitutional mandate to protect consumer rights and the environment, while opening up the floodgates for the planting of new untested genetically engineered crops, endangering farmers, consumers and the environment.”

The petition was quick and easy to sign, but it didn’t seem to have an effect on President Obama’s decision to take his pen and sign the bill into law. There is a new plan by the Food Democracy Now website that asks consumers to now demand President Obama to issue an executive order to label GMOs when you’re buying them in the grocery store. The new demand also allows consumers to sign the petition and send on the message and says:

“Today we’re calling on President Obama to issue an executive order to call for the mandatory labeling of genetically engineered foods.

Not only is GMO labeling a reasonable and common sense solution to the continued controversy that corporations like Monsanto, DuPont and Dow Chemical have created by subverting our basic democratic rights, but it is a basic right that citizens in 62 other countries around the world already enjoy, including Europe, Russia, China, India, South Africa and Saudi Arabia.”

The new petition to label GMOs is here.

If you’re wondering why the Monsanto Protection Act being signed into law as a biotech rider on something that was meant for good is such a big deal, IB Times has done a great job of pointing out some facts. IB Times titles it as the “5 Terrifying Things To Know About The HR 933 Provision.” The piece is well done and you should read it to understand how much is on the line. To sum it up, the first item states that Courts will not be able to rule by law or stop the sale of genetically engineered seeds or GMOs. Even if these genetically engineered food items cause terrible problems to your health, it will still be legal to plant them and put them on your dinner table. The second item points out that Roy Blunt (Rep. MO) (@RoyBlunt) worked with Monsanto to create the additions in the bill to allow companies like Monsanto to keep selling seeds if they’re harmful. To find out more points in the piece, take time to read it carefully.

One thing we know, is that once the cat is out of the bag, the seeds are spread everywhere in America. Most people believe that genetically engineered seeds are sterile, but it’s not true. In an NPR article in October of 2012 they state, “No, they’ll germinate and grow just like any other plant. This idea presumably has its roots in a real genetic modification (dubbed the Terminator Gene by anti-biotech activists) that can make a plant produce sterile seeds. Monsanto owns the patent on this technique, but has promised not to use it.” Another big problem is that once GE and GMOs are released into farm fields they can contaminate all other fields around them from the wind blowing, insects spreading the pollen and the natural fertilization process in plants. One farmer in Canada named Percy Schmeiser was sued when his canola was contaminated with Monsanto Roundup-tolerant canola. Mr. Schmeiser’s story was told in a documentary called, “David vs Monsanto”, we’ll include the trailer below. The lawsuit was complicated but it came down to the Schmeiser farm being destroyed through lawyer fees.

The implications of this bill have removed consumer rights to sue if they’re harmed by problems associated with GMOs. A quick article on msnNOW makes a frighteningly funny statement by saying, “If frankencorn makes you sick you won’t be able to sue.” Besides being able to sue for your health, no one will be able to stop the sale of these genetically engineered seeds.

It remains to be seen how upset consumers will continue to get as they learn their food supply has been hijacked by their own Congressman. Food Democracy Now seems to hope that an executive order by President Obama could still slow things down by labeling GMO foods, what do you think?

Obama signs ‘Monsanto Protection Act,’ Frankenfish heads to US market

On Tuesday, President Barack Obama signed the Agriculture Appropriations Bill into law. Within the legislation exists a provision, “The Monsanto Protection Act,” that has many speculating the future of food in American because it protects genetically modified seeds patents from litigation over health risks. Since Obama signed the bill, nearly 250,000 have signed a petition to President Obama. RT’s Margaret Howell has more on the bill and how “frankenfish” could be making their way into supermarkets across the nation.

David Versus Monsanto – 52 minute documentary – trailer

Imagine that a storm blows across your garden and that now, genetically-manipulated seeds are in your crops. A multi-national corporation pay you a visit, demand that you surrender your crops – and then sue you for $200 000 for the illegal use of patented, GM seeds. In this definitive David and Goliath battle, one farmer stands up against a massive multinational, and their right to claim ownership to a living organism.

GMO A Go Go – Truth about GMOs explained in new animated cartoon

How GMO foods alter organ function and pose a very real health threat to humans

The Health Ranger, Mike Adams, explains how studies in cell research have demonstrated the mechanism by which micro RNA from genetically engineered foods may alter organ function in humans.

Jeffrey M. Smith: Monsanto, GMO Seeds of Destruction

“Outrageous! That’s what you’ll say over and over again when you read how the biotechnology companies have manipulated the government, our food, and the media, and put an entire generation at risk.”

What is Genetically Modified Food?

Obama says American’s Should Know Where Their Food Is Coming From, Signs Bill Approving GMOs

Video of Obama Promising to Label Food if Elected and Bill Maher comments on Genectically Modified Food

The World According to Monsanto GMO Documentary

Environmentalist. Consumer Tech Journalist. Science Explorer. And, a dreamer. I've been contributing informative news content since 2010. Follow me on all socials!

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Adidas To Produce 11 million Parley Shoes From Ocean Plastic





Plastic pollution and improper waste disposal is a global nightmare, and it’s incredibly challenging to resolve. It could be anywhere; forests, communities, and the most profound of the oceans are already contaminated and disturbed.

Today’s headlines are filled with animals choked to death by plastic and garbage, especially those in the oceans. The waves and shores on most beaches contain wastes, floating bottles, single-use plastics, and the like. This trash is human-made, and it is just right that humans should resolve it.

It is an obvious issue that people do not want to face and talk about these issues because of guilt and shame. Years from now, the place we live in, the beaches we love, and the forests where we find lasting peace won’t be the same as it was the last time we checked on them. Our environment and natural resources suffer from the problem we have made.

There are a lot of movements and organizations pushing ocean clean-ups, proper waste disposal education, plastic elimination, and many more. The little efforts we do is an excellent start and will make a significant impact on the environment.

But, the big question is, what happens to the garbage we collected? How can we transform trash into something useful and environment-friendly?

Adidas announced its commitment to help reduce ocean plastic waste by creating 11 million pairs of new shoes out of plastic collected from the waters and beach sides around the planet.

This idea came from Cyrill Gutsch an activist designer who thought of developing a better and faster work on plastic and garbage that are always seen alongside beaches—where people run, jog, and rest.

The organization’s move to put work on these is not just a part of putting up awareness and educational programs on trash, but creating something out of nothing and transforming waste into something valuable.

This move will establish work for production and gain more out of the trash people get to pass by daily. The organization’s partnership with Adidas is a smart way of “marketing” cleaner beaches and oceans rather than imposing something people cannot cope up.

The power that fashion (and footwear) has is a robust platform to make people move faster in helping with this global issue, says Gutsch. Aside from this, people get to learn the importance and value of things that are around them, he added.

Through fashion and social media along with influential endorsers who are known around the world, it is easier to communicate with people from different parts of the globe. It becomes a trend in which people believe in too and never argue about.

It’s about time that we get a new perspective on saving our planet and earning from the human-made trash that has been disrupting the way we live. Since environmentalism started, it was all about “protesting and warning”—a good insight from Gutsch—and it was never enough to push people to their limits to help change the world on plastic-use and garbage disposal. People continued to do the same thing over and over again.

The product idea from Gutsch and the decision to turn ocean plastic wastes into materials used for Adidas’ athletic garments, is a scientific and creative level of art, he says. This initiative is a better way to actually “spread awareness” about the problem.

Parley shoes by Adidas started in the year 2017 and produced over 1 million pairs since its introduction. In 2018, they were able to make 5 million of environmentally-centric shoes made out of Parley’s ocean plastic.

However, trash is way more than the millions of shoes produced and has been adding up every single day. This fact is a sad truth that people have to face today. As ugly as it sounds, this is the hope environmentalists need to convince everyone that this is a significantly impacting issue that we all should do something and be part of the solution.

It’s not about how many Parley shoes Adidas can produce and perhaps when other shoe companies join the force, but it’s still about how people dispose of their plastic waste and having a changed heart towards the environment. The oceans are part of the world, and there are lives underneath waiting for people upland to do their job. Be the change the world needs!

Continue Reading

Current Events

Twitter Blasts Lonely Planet For Inaccurate Video Of Philippine Tourist Spot



Banaue Rice Terraces

If there is something that Filipino citizens are incredibly proud of, it is their cultural heritage and their breathtaking tourist destinations. One of the most popular among the different world-class spots is the Banaue Rice Terraces located in the mountainous Cordillera region.

The world was struck in awe over the beauty of the thousand-years-old man-made rice terraces including the travel guide Lonely Planet. However, yesterday, the travel website is in hot water after they published a video that claimed the Chinese built the famous tourist spot.

In the video released by the Lonely Planet was a feature on the “world’s greenest places.” It claimed that “these mud-walled terraces were first built around 2000 years ago by the Chinese.” Since netizens took notice of the video and the inaccuracy in its content, the company has taken it down from its Facebook page. Nonetheless, screenshots were still taken by users.

As expected, Filipino fumed with what they call was a “lie” and “an attempt to credit everything to the Chinese.” A Twitter user schooled the travel guide company with some Philippine history.

“The earliest recorded Chinese contact to the Philippines was in 982 AD. The Banaue Rice Terraces was built by Filipino indigenous people 2000 years ago. Get your facts straight.”

Following the post of Jose Ruperto Martir, which is the first time that the inaccurate content was noticed, Lonely Planet thanked the poster and said that they would take a look into it.

“Thank you for flagging this; we’ll share this with our editors who’ll take a further look into it. We’ll share updates/action points on this thread.”

Nonetheless, many Filipinos were disappointed by the mishap. A user replied to the post made by Lonely Planet in response to the post of Martir said:

“I have been watching Lonely Planet (fave host: Ian Wright) since I was a kid with my family. This is an utter disappointment!”

She also raised the concern of misinformation and the idea that it may also have happened in the past – creating a dent to the reputation of the company.

“I’m worried about the misinformation you may have made in the past. What were your sources that states the Chinese built our gorgeous Banaue Rice Terraces?”

According to the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the terraces are an “outstanding example of an evolved, living cultural landscape that can be traced as far back as two millennia ago in the pre-colonial Philippines.

Filipinos are well aware of this fact as it is one of the most basic lessons Filipino children learn in school. That is why many netizens questioned the Lonely Planet for the source of their claims.

“There are rice terraces in China. Maybe they mistook them as one and the same? Fact check fails,” a Twitter user said.

“You’ve got an error in your research studies,” another one added.

The UNESCO’s website reveals that the Banaue Rice Terraces, dubbed as the “Eighth Wonder of The World” were “all the product of the Ifugao ethnic group, a minority community that has occupied these mountains for thousands of years.”

“The Ifugao Rice Terraces are the priceless contribution of Philippine ancestors to humanity. Built 2000 years ago and passed on from generation to generation, the Ifugao Rice Terraces represent an enduring illustration of an ancient civilization that surpassed various challenges and setbacks posed by modernization,” UNESCO further noted.

Amid the faux pas and the taking down of the inaccurate video, netizen’s eagle eyes were still able to spot the same inaccurate information in Lonely Planet’s website. On its website, Lonely Planet wrote of the rice terraces: “World Heritage listed, they’re impressive not only for their chiseled beauty but because they were introduced around 2000 years ago by the Chinese.”

Screenshot from Lonely Planet’s website

The page is still up as of writing.

Because of the disappointment caused by the website and the video from Lonely Planet, netizens from the Philippines demanded an apology to the Ifugao people. They have also sought the help of the current Secretary of the Department of Tourism to respond to Lonely Planet’s inaccurate statements and misrepresentation of Filipino cultural heritage. /apr

Continue Reading


[OpEd] Earth Hour Will Not Solve The Climate Crisis; But That’s Not What It Is About



Earth hour may not be able to have a tangible impact but it's a movement that encourages conversations.

The world will once again be enveloped with darkness as it celebrates the annual Earth Hour on April 30, 2019, in 180 countries across the globe. Houses, buildings, and businesses will be turning off their lights in solidarity to the grassroots movement that aims to raise awareness on environmental problems and promote energy conservation.

Earth Hour, a campaign born in 2007 in Sydney, Australia, is probably one of the biggest grassroots campaigns for the environment that inspires individuals and organizations to take tangible climate actions for over a decade. The movement was WWF’s program that focuses on raising awareness and stimulating conversations on why nature matters. The campaign has seen tremendous bearing from civil societies and government with millions of global supporters turning their lights off for an hour.

From the Eifel Tower to the Sydney Opera House, and the Empire State Building to Burj Khalifa, thousands of global landmarks have switched off their lights in support of the movement, and encourage individuals to take their part in protecting the environment in their little ways.

Inforgraphic from Earth Hour Organization

“On one hand we have the moral responsibility to live in harmony with nature; on the other nature is vitally important to everyone’s daily lives: we depend on it for the food we eat, the air we breathe and the water we drink, and so much more. But we are pushing the planet to the limit and nature is severely under threat,” said Marco Lambertini, Director General of WWF International.

“Earth Hour 2019 is a powerful opportunity to start an unstoppable movement for nature to help secure an international commitment to stop and reverse the loss of nature – a New Deal for Nature and People as comprehensive and ambitious as the global climate deal,” he added.

Nonetheless, the impact of switching off lights for one hour is very meager and insignificant. It does not resolve the power and environmental problems that the world is facing in this day and age. The global climate crisis is so massive that even if all lights be turned off for an hour every year, nothing tangible will actually happen.

While the insignificance of the impact of Earth Hour and other grassroots campaigns like the rising movement to end single-use plastic cannot be denied, it is also necessary to understand why these campaigns have started and what they are trying to achieve in the first place.

In grass roots environmental campaigns that are targeted towards individuals to encourage them to participate in climate action, the message that they send is far more important than the pragmatic impacts of their activities. Needless to say, grassroots climate movements have successfully opened the gates for global acknowledgment that these problems exist and we should do something about it before everything’s too late.

Sustainability movements are deemed inconsequential by critics, but they proved to be gateways to more sustainable practices. In the recent campaign for the use of metal straws following the alarming plastic pollution in the Earth’s water systems, many criticized that metal straw won’t stop people from using plastic straws because it’s a cheaper and more convenient alternative to metal and bamboo straws.

And they might be right. Metal straws won’t solve the plastic problem, but the mere fact that conversations are happening because of them is a massive win for the movement. The discussion borne from the metal straw trend has reached multinational companies and pressured them to implement changes in their business practices.

Nevertheless, the fight for environmental sustainability is still a long battle ahead. Amid the loud call for corporate social responsibility, many members of the corporate universe seem to be pretending to have deaf ears. Oil giants, among other multinational corporations, have been spending millions of dollars on lobbying for environmentally problematic policies and on stopping laws that may compromise their businesses. And when business and money talks, everyone listens – including legislators.

This is why grassroots movements are essential. They are the ones that create the conversation that will pressure the government and the corporate sector to affect change in policy. The more that these campaigns reach and touch people’s hearts, the more that the calls to end corporate enslavement of the environment become screams that echo fervently.

The fight for the environment is not for ourselves; but for the future generations to see the beauty of our home as we know it. Let’s do our part to make Earth a conducive planet for our grandchildren and their grandchildren to thrive and prosper in. Switching your lights off on Saturday is a small thing, but it creates huge waves of hope and solidarity. /apr

Continue Reading

Today’s Latest

Our Voices

Silicon Valley Silicon Valley
Our Voice15 hours ago

How Tech Companies Affect Communities In Places They Call ‘Home’

Tech companies are today’s driving forces in the economic world, mostly because of the introduction of the Internet. It allows...

We reviewed RingCentral's VoIP offers We reviewed RingCentral's VoIP offers
Our Voice5 days ago

RingCentral VoIP Review

VoIP has had a significant shift from a technology exclusively used by the early adopters or hobbyist to a widely...

April Fools April Fools
Our Voice2 months ago

April Fools Jokes Aren’t Just “Jokes”

April Fools is undoubtedly a fun day, exceptionally if you have crafted the most elaborate prank on your friends and...

Facebook Facebook
Facebook2 months ago

Facebook Should Do Better At Processing Community Standard Violations, And They Should Do It Fast

A few months ago, I saw a photo of myself used by another Facebook account with a “R.I.P. (Rest in...

With reports of artists committing harassments, should you separate the art from the artist? With reports of artists committing harassments, should you separate the art from the artist?
Our Voice2 months ago

Supporting Problematic Artists And Their Arts, An Opinion

As the world becomes swarmed by reports of famous artists – musicians, comedians, actors, painters – being alleged or in...

How to regulate facial recognition without possible risks How to regulate facial recognition without possible risks
Our Voice2 months ago

Ethical Regulation Of ‘Facial Recognition’ Is A Shared Responsibility

There is an ongoing discussion both in online and offline spaces regarding the growth of facial recognition technology and its...

Solving Data Breachs, must focus on SMBs Solving Data Breachs, must focus on SMBs
Cybersecurity2 months ago

Data Breach Epidemic: Solving The Problem In SMBs Will Solve The Problem For All

In the last two weeks, we’ve witnessed a vast amount of data breaches and information leaks, and the issue has...

Here's why we agree to Jacinda Ardern, New Zealand Prime Minister words of not naming mass shooter suspects Here's why we agree to Jacinda Ardern, New Zealand Prime Minister words of not naming mass shooter suspects
Our Voice2 months ago

We Agree To PM Ardern Of Keeping Christchurch Murderer Nameless, And The Media Should Listen

In the wake of Christchurch mosques shooting in New Zealand that killed 50 people at two mosques, the shooter is...

Apple Anti-Snooping Paten Apple Anti-Snooping Paten
Apple2 months ago

Apple vs. Police Authorities; A Cold War Against iPhone’s Anti-Snooping Patent

To protect its customers from hackers and illegal surveillance, Apple is developing an anti-snooping technology that would impede police and...

Fighting misinformation over measles outbreak Fighting misinformation over measles outbreak
Our Voice2 months ago

An Epidemic: Measles Or Misinformation?

2018 was the year when people started asking the question: ‘should I get my child vaccinated?’ Most people answered yes,...

Join us as we delve into the future of the VoIP industry Join us as we delve into the future of the VoIP industry
Our Voice3 months ago

Take A Look At The Predicted Future Of The VoIP Industry

For the past 20 years, VoIP has become an integral part of the lives of millions of people around the...

Contact Center Solutions Contact Center Solutions
Business3 months ago

Choose The Right Call Center And The Best Contact Center Solutions of 2019

The Ins And Outs Of Business Communication Management For your business to exist in today’s world, you must know how...

Instagram poses as a threat to some of the world's most famous location Instagram poses as a threat to some of the world's most famous location
Our Voice3 months ago

How Instagram Corrupts Famous Locations In The World

Is Instagram corrupting the beauty of breathtakingly beautiful locations and sucking all the joy out of traveling? With the era...

How one can earn crypto How one can earn crypto
Our Voice4 months ago

Ways To Earn Cryptocurrency

Cryptocurrency is one of the growing medium for exchange in most countries as it offers a more convenient and safer...

Ending Payday Loans Ending Payday Loans
Our Voice4 months ago

Can We End Payday Loans?

We can’t neglect the fact that debt is one of the pressing problems in the country, especially in today’s economy....

How will 5G change our lives -- Our Voice How will 5G change our lives -- Our Voice
Our Voice4 months ago

Jumping From 4G To 5G: Here’s What 5G Can Do For You

One of the most awaited advancements in technology is the cellular industry. With its monthly updates on software, model and...

VoIP vs Traditional Telephones: Cost Factors to consider VoIP vs Traditional Telephones: Cost Factors to consider
Our Voice4 months ago

What are the cost factors of VoIP?

In the next few years, we might be saying goodbye to traditional telephone systems in exchange for Voice over Internet...

Manufacturing Firms Investment on Technology Manufacturing Firms Investment on Technology
Our Voice5 months ago

Manufacturing Firms are Investing More on Technology

Based on the recent research on how manufacturing companies are coming up in the market industry, they have been increasing...

How to properly take Technology Innovation in companies How to properly take Technology Innovation in companies
Our Voice5 months ago

Technology innovation in companies—for the better or the worse?

Technology has significantly impacted both homes and workplaces in the last years. As much as we want to keep our...