Connect with us

Politics

Keith Olbermann Fired From Current TV Today

Published

on

Keith Olbermann Fired From Current TV Today

You’ve heard right, Keith Olbermann was fired from Current TV today and the news was mostly broken on Twitter. Mr. Olbermann has released his own statements on his Twitter account in short statements and using the service Twitlonger. Joel Hyatt and former Vice President Al Gore are the executives at Current TV and they’ve released their statement too as to why they fired Keith Olbermann.

The show that Current TV cancelled was the prime-time show “Countdown” by Keith Olberman. The replacement for the show is New York governor and former CNN show anchor Eliot Spitzer. The exact statement at Current.com states, “Current was also founded on the values of respect, openness, collegiality, and loyalty to our viewers. Unfortunately these values are no longer reflected in our relationship with Keith Olbermann and we have ended it.”

The letter was signed by Joel Hyatt & Al Gore Current’s Founders. Their entire letter can be read here which describes the new prime-time show that will replace Keith Olbermann’s “Countdown” now that he has been fired. Firing Keith Olbermann sparked a lot Twitter chatter among viewers who were sad to see him fired and also viewers that felt it was time for him to go.

Even thought he media & Keith Olbermann started talking about the firing today, the offical firing took place Thursday morning when a letter was delivered to Mr. Olbermann’s agent, Nick Khan. One piece that isn’t being talked about too much is the part in the letter that states the firing was due to, “Mr. Olbermann’s serial, material breach of his contract, including the failure to show up at work (Unauthorized Absences); sabotaging the network (Failure To Promote); and attacking Current and its executives (Disparagement).”

According to Mediaite.com their sources have stated that Keith Olberman missed 19 out of 41 workign days. The pay for Mr. Olbermann was said to be around $50,000 per episode of Countdown which came to a total payout of two-million dollars in the contract. Some of the days Mr. Olbermann missed were some of the biggest political days like the Iowa Caucus and the New Hampshire Primary.

Keith Olberman’s offical statement released by his Twitter account & Twitlonger at @keitholbermann is as follows:

“My full statement:

I’d like to apologize to my viewers and my staff for the failure of Current TV.

Editorially, Countdown had never been better. But for more than a year I have been imploring Al Gore and Joel Hyatt to resolve our issues internally, while I’ve been not publicizing my complaints, and keeping the show alive for the sake of its loyal viewers and even more loyal staff. Nevertheless, Mr. Gore and Mr. Hyatt, instead of abiding by their promises and obligations and investing in a quality news program, finally thought it was more economical to try to get out of my contract.

It goes almost without saying that the claims against me implied in Current’s statement are untrue and will be proved so in the legal actions I will be filing against them presently. To understand Mr. Hyatt’s “values of respect, openness, collegiality and loyalty,” I encourage you to read of a previous occasion Mr. Hyatt found himself in court for having unjustly fired an employee. That employee’s name was Clarence B. Cain. http://nyti.ms/HueZsa

In due course, the truth of the ethics of Mr. Gore and Mr. Hyatt will come out. For now, it is important only to again acknowledge that joining them was a sincere and well-intentioned gesture on my part, but in retrospect a foolish one. That lack of judgment is mine and mine alone, and I apologize again for it.”

After the release of those tweets jokes were made and passed around Twitter which soon became popular and retweeted. One of the most popular was a tongue in cheek joke made by Andy Levy when he tweeted: @andylevy: After being fired yet again, I now realize that I must look within myself to figure out why this keeps happening” – Keith Olbermann.

 

It remains to be seen what Keith Olbermann’s next direction is in his career. For now it seems like he will have to dig down deep and figure out how to convince other media conglomerates that he can show up to work.

Keith Olbermann Countdown Trayvon Martin & George Zimmerman Coverage

Click to comment

0 Comments

  1. Rich

    March 31, 2012 at 6:18 pm

    Obermann was already a loser before the firing – now he’s just a bigger loser. I hope he doesn’t find some new place to whine because I’m tired of it.

    • noche

      April 3, 2012 at 6:46 pm

      You should be half as smart as Keith Olbermann-the only loser is you.

    • Dahl

      April 4, 2012 at 1:40 pm

      Poor baby – you should go lay down now!

  2. stan chaz

    March 31, 2012 at 2:53 am

    Did Current TV simply use Keith to gain attention and higher ratings? They KNEW what they were getting! Keith injects emotion into his commentary, his intelligent and incisive reporting, his humor, and his relationships….all of which makes his program so interesting. You FEEL his pain, you FEEL his anger, and you FEEL his heart-felt sincerity when he covers a story. He’s never just a talking head! If Keith is absent from Current TV, then I too will be absent from Current TV. Keith is one of the best- hands down; as shown by is coverage of OWS, which was outstanding. I wish him well and hope he is back on the air soon. We need his unique voice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Trump Adviser Peter Thiel Wants FBI And CIA To Investigate Google’s ‘Treasonous’ Behavior

He asked: “How many foreign intelligence agencies have infiltrated your Manhattan Project for AI?”

Published

on

Photo: JD Lasica | Flickr | CC BY 2.0

Peter Thiel, one of Facebook’s Board Members and a close consultant for President Donald Trump, has called for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Central Intelligence Agency to launch an investigation against Google after the San Francisco-based tech giant withdrawn from a high-value project with the military.

Trump’s adviser also questions the relationship between Google and the Chinese military, calling it “treasonous,” a new report from Axios last Sunday revealed.

In 2018, Google decided to withdraw from a contract between the tech superpower and the U.S. Department of Defense for the development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology citing that the projects have certain ethical issues that they cannot be involved in.

Thiel, who is also a board member on Facebook, wants the FBI and CIA to investigate how Google is used by foreign intelligence. He wants the government agencies to ask the company “how many foreign intelligence agencies have infiltrated your Manhattan Project for AI?”

According to Axios’ report, there are no public documents that stipulate any infiltration by foreign intelligence of Google. However, they said that Thiel owns a company called Palantir, which works with the Trump Administration and has access to millions worth of government data, including American private information. Nonetheless, it is still unclear if Thiel’s assertions are motivated by any personal and classified knowledge he drew from his relationship with the White House.

“Number two, does Google’s senior management consider itself to have been thoroughly infiltrated by Chinese intelligence?” Thiel continued.

“Number three, is it because they consider themselves to be so thoroughly infiltrated that they have engaged in the seemingly treasonous decision to work with the Chinese military and not with the U.S. military… because they are making the sort of bad, short-term rationalistic [decision] that if the technology doesn’t go out the front door, it gets stolen out the backdoor anyway?”

Peter Thiel raised the said statements (or rather questions) during his talk at the National Conservatism Conference in Washington, D.C. The crowd-packed lecture was entitled “The Star Trek Computer Is Not Enough,” according to a schedule posted to the conference website.

If Thiel is indeed referring to Google’s 2018 decision, he is not the first person to question the company regarding its refusal to work with the US military. Earlier this year, General Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, echoed similar sentiments as that of Thiel but did not specify the term “treason.”

Speaking to the Senate Armed Services Committee in March, Dunford said, “We watch with great concern when industry partners work in China knowing there is that indirect benefit, and frankly ‘indirect’ may be not a full characterization of the way it really is. It’s more of a direct benefit to the Chinese military.”

Aside from targeting Google’s integrity, some attendees to Sunday’s lecture said that Thiel also attacked Americans saying that they were too fat and addicted to drugs, adding that, “the biggest problem in our society is the problem of political correctness.”

“American exceptionalism has led us to a country that is exceptionally overweight, exceptionally addicted to opioids, exceptionally unaware and exceptionally un-self-reflective,” Thiel said as transcribed by Keith Urban who attended the conference and previously worked for Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.

Other reports said that Thiel also made comments on how American Ivy Leagues and top universities are losing their non-profit status. He also said that any links between Google and China, “need to be asked by the FBI, by the CIA, and I’m not sure quite how to put this, I would like them to be asked in a not excessively gentle manner.”

When asked for certain clarification, neither Google nor the team of Peter Thiel has responded to Z6Mag’s request for comments yet.

Continue Reading

Politics

Homeland Security Hearing On Data Breach: CBP Seem To Not Know What They’re Doing

They’re not even sure when they knew about the incident.

Published

on

Photo: CBP Website

The hearing conducted by the Department of Homeland Security this week that centers on the recent data breach that compromised images of American and foreign travelers from airports’ facial recognition system, proved that there are officials in the position who is incompetent regarding data security and technology in general.

A senior Customs and Border Protection (CBP) official proved unable to answer the most rudimentary questions about a recent data breach and instead of sending a capable expert from their office, the CBP sent John Wagner, the deputy executive assistant commissioner of the agency’s Office of Field Operations, who, according to critics, cannot and did not offer any intelligible answer even to the most rudimentary questions about the issue at hand.

According to other reports, Wagner does not know details of the breach, including those that involved their agency. For example, when asked whether the surveillance company at the center of the breach, Perceptics, first reported the incident to CBP, or whether it was the other way around, the senior official was not sure what to say.

Instead, he said: “I believe we asked them about it […] I need to verify this.”

He even admits that he has problems recalling even the most obvious details about the case. “My recollection seems to be that we asked them if any of our data was included in it, and they came back and said yes,” he said.

Interestingly, Perceptics and CBP seem not to have the same memory of what happened. In an interview with the Washington Post, Perceptics said that they discovered the data breach on May 13th and immediately reported the incident to the Federal Bureau of Investigation within the next 24 hours after their discovery. However, in a statement that the regulatory agency released last month, CBP said that they were only made aware of the data breach on May 31st.

Furthermore, it is also questioned why the CBP insisted in the statement that it released that none of the images included in the said data breach were found online and could not be traced to anybody when journalist and independent investigators have reported seeing the leaked photos online.

Emma Best, a journalist whose organization, Distributed Denial of Secrets, has cataloged the exposed data and made it available for public review, described the breach as one of the largest known involving a government contractor. It includes, for instance, hundreds of thousands of emails and documents, passwords, schematics, and equipment lists. “It’s virtually all of the company’s data,” she said.

“It spells out how their surveillance systems and services work, giving more than enough detail to reconstruct it. The cache covers border security and surveillance systems, along with systems for government and private facilities including CBP, the Drug Enforcement Agency, and the Pentagon,” she said.

To make matters worse, Wagner could also not tell Homeland Security whether their agency is monitoring and auditing their government contractors. When asked, he said: “I’m not aware of that. I don’t know.”

Furthermore, even if the notification procedure is an essential process in handling data breach cases, Wagner wasn’t also sure whether or not they should report to Congress what.

“We do report it to Congress if it meets a certain threshold,” he said. But when asked what the threshold was, he replied: “I don’t know offhand.”

“I believe it’s a hundred thousand,” he said. A hundred thousand of what—Files? Gigabytes? Victims?—it’s unclear. “I’ll have to get back to you on that,” he said.

Worse, instead of taking responsibility for the incident, Wagner is pressing the blame to their contractor saying that they were not informed about the data breach “for a significant amount of time” after Perceptics allegedly discovered the compromise.

When asked how long the breach went unreported, he told lawmakers, “I have that answer.” But then he added, “Let me look for that, and I’ll come back to you.” But he never did.

Continue Reading

Politics

‘PragerU’ To ‘Youtube’: “We Will See You In Court”

PragerU challenges Youtube to see them in court as a response to the video streaming service’s denial of bias against Trump and the right-wing.

Published

on

Youtube said they have "no bias" against conservative politicians. Photo: Rafael Rigues | Flickr | CC BY 2.0

When Youtube denied political bias against conservative figures like President Donald Trump, PragerU, another politically motivated content creator, challenges the Google-owned video streaming platform to “see you (them) in court.”

Youtube claimed that the popular video-based social media platform has “no bias” against conservative politicians, following the investigative journalism group, Project Veritas, reported that they had removed a video allegedly exposing Google officials of political bias against Trump saying that Google is the only one that can end another “Trump situation.”

The video, which has since been removed from the platform by Youtube, shows a senior employee at the company appearing to admit that the company plans to interfere in the next presidential election to stop Donald Trump.

The video is still available in the Project Veritas website and featured undercover footage of a top Google employee, Jen Gennai, who preaches that the company, Google, should not be broken up because they still need to stop the reelection of the President and only they can prevent “next Trump situation.”

“Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that,” the video revealed appearing to be said by Gennai.

In the same video, Gennai also appears to declare that Trump’s victory in the 2016 elections “screwed us (Google).”

“We all got screwed over in 2016; again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over, so we’re rapidly like, happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again,” she added.

“We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?”

Youtube’s ratio’d response

As a response, Youtube posted a tweet in the site’s official Twitter account @YoutubeInsider saying that they are applying their community standards equally to all accounts.

“We’ve had a lot of questions today…clarifying; we apply our policies fairly and without political bias. All creators are held to the same standard,” reads Youtube’s official tweet.

However, it seems like the tweet raised more eyebrows than expected as experts are saying that the clarification message by Youtube has been “ratio’d.” Ratio-ing is a twitter slang, which means a tweet gets more replies and comments than a retweet, which is indicative that the statement was controversial enough or the users do not agree with it.

James O’Keefe, the founder of Project Veritas, which exposed numerous scandals corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud, and other misconduct by private individuals, corporations, politicians and government agencies, exposed the Twitter ratio of Youtube’s post in his tweet.

“The ratio on YouTube’s official response and CNN’s @brianstelter ridiculous assertions to @Project_Veritas makes the Soviet Union’s Pravda look honest,” writes O’Keefe.

“We will see you in court”

Similarly, PragerU, which has sued Youtube in the past for discriminatory practices, replied to YouTube in a tweet to face their lawsuit in the courts.

Asked for comments regarding their latest tweet, a spokesperson said that Google and Youtube have recently been targeting PragerU on the basis that they are conservative.

“The recent developments and leaks from Google insiders make it even more clear that they are intentionally targeting PragerU, simply because we are conservative. This is why we sued Google and YouTube, and we look forward to using this new evidence when we meet in court in late August,” the spokesperson said.

“Google is a bully and continues to lie about being a neutral public platform while deliberately targeting conservatives. They need to be held accountable, and we will continue to fight back both in the courtroom and in the court of public opinion. It’s disturbing that the entire mainstream media has completely ignored the issue of Big Tech censorship against conservatives. It’s clear the media doesn’t care about free speech, and they only care about pushing their left-wing agenda.”

Continue Reading

Trending