Connect with us

Politics

Adele’s Political Action Against Newt at the Grammy Awards

Published

on

Adele Newt Parody VideoPlease read Disclaimer below. The video is a spoof.

The Queen of the 2012 Grammy Award’s that took place last Sunday night, February 12th, Adele, didn’t hesitate to use her power and influence to take political action during the Grammy commercials. It may have been kept on the “hush hush,” as few have yet to report it, but Adele, who won six awards that night, including the highly coveted “Album of the Year” decided to take a break from singing about “rubbish relationships,” as she would call the subject of her Album, 21, and sing instead, about rubbish politics. Perhaps, starting the night in an exclusive interview for 60 Minutes by Anderson Cooper motivated the singer to use her strong vocal chords and voice to be a booming negative political case against the former Speaker of the House and current controversial GOP republican candidate, Newt Gingrich.

Newt has received negative attention in the past for criticizing Clinton for his extramarital affairs, yet having multiple affairs himself, and his highly recommended resignation as Speaker in 1998 under Clinton’s presidential term. Most recently, negative attention has leant to the policies he wishes to propose, should he win the nomination, such as the implementation of student janitorial worker programs in public schools and his desire to fund the building of a base on the moon. He has been accused of being, as Adele would put it, “A political insider.”

The negative accusations were all highlighted in Adele’s version of “Someone Like You,” renamed “(Any guy besides) Someone Like Newt.” She performed the rendition during the commercial break for the Grammy Awards in a polished, dramatic, and perhaps, quite brave political performance. Many musical artists in the past have taken their moment in the lime-light to express their political views, only to be reprimanded by their fans and take a huge hit in ratings (ie. The Dixie Chicks); however, it appears no one doubts Adele will have any trouble influencing an audience that just saw her win every category she was nominated for (that’s as many Grammy’s as Whitney Houston won in her entire Career).

“Someone Like You” won one of those awards and one can only wonder whether “Someone Like Newt” will gain any sort of popularity on the political stage. Considering Newt has been slipping in the polls in the recent primaries since South Carolina, it may not be long before his critics pick up this hot new single.

Disclaimer: 

It has come to Z6Mag’s attention that one of our writers submitted this story thinking it was true. We have vetted the information and found the video is a spoof and the story associated with it is not accurate. Sorry for any confusion. We at z6mag.com aim for accuracy and truth and will do our best to keep a similar error from happening again. Thanks for reading z6mag.com.

Sincerely,

Joel Mackey
Executive Editor

Image Source: The Atlantic


Click to comment

0 Comments

  1. juice

    February 17, 2012 at 5:25 pm

    This website is now a fantasy of fairy tales.

  2. Gene

    February 17, 2012 at 5:20 pm

    No way she would be that stupid to get involved in American Politics.

  3. taylor hazlehurst

    February 17, 2012 at 5:16 pm

    I just started submitting articles for Z6mag recently, and I did not intend to report a fake story. In fact, I am quite humiliated by the whole thing. I have been very busy lately and did not check my source well enough. I figured that the Atlantic was a credible source and sadly, they are not. I happen to be good friends with the Executive Editor, Joel Mackey, and usually he is very on top of the stories he publishes, but I think he, perhaps trusted that I would do my homework.

    Knowing him personally, however, I know that he, his wife, and the rest of Z6 are very thorough in their research and have learned from this experience to be more thorough in approving articles that have been submitted. It was an unfortunate mistake, but I do hope that you will forgive me and continue to read Z6mag.

    I really enjoy the articles Z6 publishes. I know they strive very hard to report very accurate, entertaining, and interesting stories. They always appreciate and learn from the feedback they receive.

    Again, my apologies and warmest regards,

    Taylor Hazlehurst

  4. Hipskier

    February 17, 2012 at 4:34 pm

    FAKE! FAKE! FAKE! No matter what we, Adele, or Newt believe in, this post by Z6Mag is outrageously desperate leaving a bad impression and a bad reputation for whomever owns this site and whomever edited this video. The Atlantic & Z6Mag…Shame on you both!

  5. Lindsey

    February 17, 2012 at 3:14 pm

    You do realize this is completely fake, right? Some people are so gullible.

  6. myself

    February 17, 2012 at 12:42 pm

    That was actually extremely witty at points. I laughed out loud at a couple points.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Trump Adviser Peter Thiel Wants FBI And CIA To Investigate Google’s ‘Treasonous’ Behavior

He asked: “How many foreign intelligence agencies have infiltrated your Manhattan Project for AI?”

Published

on

Photo: JD Lasica | Flickr | CC BY 2.0

Peter Thiel, one of Facebook’s Board Members and a close consultant for President Donald Trump, has called for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Central Intelligence Agency to launch an investigation against Google after the San Francisco-based tech giant withdrawn from a high-value project with the military.

Trump’s adviser also questions the relationship between Google and the Chinese military, calling it “treasonous,” a new report from Axios last Sunday revealed.

In 2018, Google decided to withdraw from a contract between the tech superpower and the U.S. Department of Defense for the development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology citing that the projects have certain ethical issues that they cannot be involved in.

Thiel, who is also a board member on Facebook, wants the FBI and CIA to investigate how Google is used by foreign intelligence. He wants the government agencies to ask the company “how many foreign intelligence agencies have infiltrated your Manhattan Project for AI?”

According to Axios’ report, there are no public documents that stipulate any infiltration by foreign intelligence of Google. However, they said that Thiel owns a company called Palantir, which works with the Trump Administration and has access to millions worth of government data, including American private information. Nonetheless, it is still unclear if Thiel’s assertions are motivated by any personal and classified knowledge he drew from his relationship with the White House.

“Number two, does Google’s senior management consider itself to have been thoroughly infiltrated by Chinese intelligence?” Thiel continued.

“Number three, is it because they consider themselves to be so thoroughly infiltrated that they have engaged in the seemingly treasonous decision to work with the Chinese military and not with the U.S. military… because they are making the sort of bad, short-term rationalistic [decision] that if the technology doesn’t go out the front door, it gets stolen out the backdoor anyway?”

Peter Thiel raised the said statements (or rather questions) during his talk at the National Conservatism Conference in Washington, D.C. The crowd-packed lecture was entitled “The Star Trek Computer Is Not Enough,” according to a schedule posted to the conference website.

If Thiel is indeed referring to Google’s 2018 decision, he is not the first person to question the company regarding its refusal to work with the US military. Earlier this year, General Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, echoed similar sentiments as that of Thiel but did not specify the term “treason.”

Speaking to the Senate Armed Services Committee in March, Dunford said, “We watch with great concern when industry partners work in China knowing there is that indirect benefit, and frankly ‘indirect’ may be not a full characterization of the way it really is. It’s more of a direct benefit to the Chinese military.”

Aside from targeting Google’s integrity, some attendees to Sunday’s lecture said that Thiel also attacked Americans saying that they were too fat and addicted to drugs, adding that, “the biggest problem in our society is the problem of political correctness.”

“American exceptionalism has led us to a country that is exceptionally overweight, exceptionally addicted to opioids, exceptionally unaware and exceptionally un-self-reflective,” Thiel said as transcribed by Keith Urban who attended the conference and previously worked for Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.

Other reports said that Thiel also made comments on how American Ivy Leagues and top universities are losing their non-profit status. He also said that any links between Google and China, “need to be asked by the FBI, by the CIA, and I’m not sure quite how to put this, I would like them to be asked in a not excessively gentle manner.”

When asked for certain clarification, neither Google nor the team of Peter Thiel has responded to Z6Mag’s request for comments yet.

Continue Reading

Politics

Homeland Security Hearing On Data Breach: CBP Seem To Not Know What They’re Doing

They’re not even sure when they knew about the incident.

Published

on

Photo: CBP Website

The hearing conducted by the Department of Homeland Security this week that centers on the recent data breach that compromised images of American and foreign travelers from airports’ facial recognition system, proved that there are officials in the position who is incompetent regarding data security and technology in general.

A senior Customs and Border Protection (CBP) official proved unable to answer the most rudimentary questions about a recent data breach and instead of sending a capable expert from their office, the CBP sent John Wagner, the deputy executive assistant commissioner of the agency’s Office of Field Operations, who, according to critics, cannot and did not offer any intelligible answer even to the most rudimentary questions about the issue at hand.

According to other reports, Wagner does not know details of the breach, including those that involved their agency. For example, when asked whether the surveillance company at the center of the breach, Perceptics, first reported the incident to CBP, or whether it was the other way around, the senior official was not sure what to say.

Instead, he said: “I believe we asked them about it […] I need to verify this.”

He even admits that he has problems recalling even the most obvious details about the case. “My recollection seems to be that we asked them if any of our data was included in it, and they came back and said yes,” he said.

Interestingly, Perceptics and CBP seem not to have the same memory of what happened. In an interview with the Washington Post, Perceptics said that they discovered the data breach on May 13th and immediately reported the incident to the Federal Bureau of Investigation within the next 24 hours after their discovery. However, in a statement that the regulatory agency released last month, CBP said that they were only made aware of the data breach on May 31st.

Furthermore, it is also questioned why the CBP insisted in the statement that it released that none of the images included in the said data breach were found online and could not be traced to anybody when journalist and independent investigators have reported seeing the leaked photos online.

Emma Best, a journalist whose organization, Distributed Denial of Secrets, has cataloged the exposed data and made it available for public review, described the breach as one of the largest known involving a government contractor. It includes, for instance, hundreds of thousands of emails and documents, passwords, schematics, and equipment lists. “It’s virtually all of the company’s data,” she said.

“It spells out how their surveillance systems and services work, giving more than enough detail to reconstruct it. The cache covers border security and surveillance systems, along with systems for government and private facilities including CBP, the Drug Enforcement Agency, and the Pentagon,” she said.

To make matters worse, Wagner could also not tell Homeland Security whether their agency is monitoring and auditing their government contractors. When asked, he said: “I’m not aware of that. I don’t know.”

Furthermore, even if the notification procedure is an essential process in handling data breach cases, Wagner wasn’t also sure whether or not they should report to Congress what.

“We do report it to Congress if it meets a certain threshold,” he said. But when asked what the threshold was, he replied: “I don’t know offhand.”

“I believe it’s a hundred thousand,” he said. A hundred thousand of what—Files? Gigabytes? Victims?—it’s unclear. “I’ll have to get back to you on that,” he said.

Worse, instead of taking responsibility for the incident, Wagner is pressing the blame to their contractor saying that they were not informed about the data breach “for a significant amount of time” after Perceptics allegedly discovered the compromise.

When asked how long the breach went unreported, he told lawmakers, “I have that answer.” But then he added, “Let me look for that, and I’ll come back to you.” But he never did.

Continue Reading

Politics

‘PragerU’ To ‘Youtube’: “We Will See You In Court”

PragerU challenges Youtube to see them in court as a response to the video streaming service’s denial of bias against Trump and the right-wing.

Published

on

Youtube said they have "no bias" against conservative politicians. Photo: Rafael Rigues | Flickr | CC BY 2.0

When Youtube denied political bias against conservative figures like President Donald Trump, PragerU, another politically motivated content creator, challenges the Google-owned video streaming platform to “see you (them) in court.”

Youtube claimed that the popular video-based social media platform has “no bias” against conservative politicians, following the investigative journalism group, Project Veritas, reported that they had removed a video allegedly exposing Google officials of political bias against Trump saying that Google is the only one that can end another “Trump situation.”

The video, which has since been removed from the platform by Youtube, shows a senior employee at the company appearing to admit that the company plans to interfere in the next presidential election to stop Donald Trump.

The video is still available in the Project Veritas website and featured undercover footage of a top Google employee, Jen Gennai, who preaches that the company, Google, should not be broken up because they still need to stop the reelection of the President and only they can prevent “next Trump situation.”

“Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that,” the video revealed appearing to be said by Gennai.

In the same video, Gennai also appears to declare that Trump’s victory in the 2016 elections “screwed us (Google).”

“We all got screwed over in 2016; again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over, so we’re rapidly like, happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again,” she added.

“We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?”

Youtube’s ratio’d response

As a response, Youtube posted a tweet in the site’s official Twitter account @YoutubeInsider saying that they are applying their community standards equally to all accounts.

“We’ve had a lot of questions today…clarifying; we apply our policies fairly and without political bias. All creators are held to the same standard,” reads Youtube’s official tweet.

However, it seems like the tweet raised more eyebrows than expected as experts are saying that the clarification message by Youtube has been “ratio’d.” Ratio-ing is a twitter slang, which means a tweet gets more replies and comments than a retweet, which is indicative that the statement was controversial enough or the users do not agree with it.

James O’Keefe, the founder of Project Veritas, which exposed numerous scandals corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud, and other misconduct by private individuals, corporations, politicians and government agencies, exposed the Twitter ratio of Youtube’s post in his tweet.

“The ratio on YouTube’s official response and CNN’s @brianstelter ridiculous assertions to @Project_Veritas makes the Soviet Union’s Pravda look honest,” writes O’Keefe.

“We will see you in court”

Similarly, PragerU, which has sued Youtube in the past for discriminatory practices, replied to YouTube in a tweet to face their lawsuit in the courts.

Asked for comments regarding their latest tweet, a spokesperson said that Google and Youtube have recently been targeting PragerU on the basis that they are conservative.

“The recent developments and leaks from Google insiders make it even more clear that they are intentionally targeting PragerU, simply because we are conservative. This is why we sued Google and YouTube, and we look forward to using this new evidence when we meet in court in late August,” the spokesperson said.

“Google is a bully and continues to lie about being a neutral public platform while deliberately targeting conservatives. They need to be held accountable, and we will continue to fight back both in the courtroom and in the court of public opinion. It’s disturbing that the entire mainstream media has completely ignored the issue of Big Tech censorship against conservatives. It’s clear the media doesn’t care about free speech, and they only care about pushing their left-wing agenda.”

Continue Reading

Trending